← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3359/2015disposed

Dr. Shyam Babu Roy v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-06-24Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3359 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Dr. Shyam Babu Roy S/o Late Akshay Lal Roy Resident of Village Nirmal Niwas, Naya Tola, Raghopur, P.S. Bakhtiyarpur, District Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya.

3. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya.

4. The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya.

5. The Principal Ram Lakhan Singh Yadav College, Bakhtiyarpur, P.S. Bakhtiyarpur, District Patna.

6. The Principal - Ram Ratan Singh College, Mokama, P.S. Mokama, District Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sucheta Yadav For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anshuman Singh, GP 24 Mr Girijish Kumar =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-06-2015 It is obligatory upon the Registrar of the University to communicate to the petitioner the status of payments which the petitioner has claimed and now annexed with the reply to the counter affidavit of the University, especially Annexure- 3 series. The stand of the University in the counter affidavit is that all payments to the petitioner have already been made in terms of audit clearance. Nothing is pending with the University of the petitioner. Let this position be clarified to the petitioner so that he can take appropriate remedial measure. All this exercise must be done within a period of

Patna High Court CWJC No.3359 of 2015 dt.24-06-2015 2/2 10 weeks from the date of production of a copy of this order. The Court expresses no opinion on any of the assertions made in the writ application.

Writ is disposed of in terms of above.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U