Saroj Manjhi @ Sanju Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31513 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -243 Year- 2017 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ====================================================== Saroj Manjhi @ Sanju Manjhi Son of Sukhi Manjhi Resident of VillageNimiyatanr, P.S. Barachatti, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nikhilesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Barachatti P.S.Case No. 243 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25( 1b) a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of one live cartridge.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he is in custody for more than two months having clean antecedent. Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31513 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya, in connection with Barachatti P.S.Case No. 243 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(iv) If active involvement of the petitioner is found in such type of cases in future, his bail bond shall be cancelled.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U