← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14483/2023bail granted

Jitendra Kumar Singh @ Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-29Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14483 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-331 Year-2022 Thana- UJIYARPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== JITENDRA KUMAR SINGH @ JITENDRA KUMAR Son of Ramesh Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Mohammadpur Sakra Tole, P.S.- Bibhutipur, District - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under sections 30(a) and 41(2(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 2661.12 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that 2661.12 liters wine is recovered from pick up van. The pick up van in question does not belong to the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of disclosure made by the local residents. The names of local residents, who have named the petitioner, have not been disclosed by the prosecution.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14483 of 2023(2) dt.29-04-2023 2/2 Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the order dated 13.04.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 626 of 2022 (Sweta Kumari versus State of Bihar).

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R./complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court in connection with Ujiyarpur P.S. case No. 331 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T