Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14686 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-193 Year-2025 Thana- KAUWAKOL District- Nawada ====================================================== Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar S/o Hira Yadav @ Jawahar Yadav @ Hiru Yadav R/o Village- Bhorambagh, P.O.- Itpakwa, PS- Kawakol, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Muskan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-04-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 305(e), 317(4) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 17.05.2025, at 9.30 P.M. he went to village Bhorambag for raid and investigation of sand in Naki river and found that illegal sand mining was done as detailed in the FIR and local persons disclosed that accused persons including the petitioner were involved in illegal sand mining, thus alleges that on account of illegal sand mining, the government lost revenue of nearly Rs.18 lacs.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14686 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026 2/2 as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that no illegally sand mine was seized from the place of occurrence nor any tractor was seized but then based on disclosure made by the local persons the petitioner came to be implicated. It is further submitted that police in mechanical manner investigates and implicates once an accused is implicated in a case of similar nature. It is also submitted that if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted, the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kawakole P.S. Case No.193/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T