Rakesh Pandey v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7137 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1985 Year- 2013 Thana -NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE DistrictNAWADA ====================================================== Rakesh Pandey son of Pramod Pandey @ Pravesh Pandey, resident of Village- Arai Keshopur, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya. At present- Near Nalanda Engineering College Gate Via Nizamia College, Mohammadpur, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Babita Devi wife of Rakesh Pandey, D/o Devendra Pandey, resident of Village- Arai Keshopur, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya. At present Resident of Village- Daulatpur, Police Station- Sitamarhi, District- Nawada .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Anita Kumari Singh (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The husband and the wife are ready to restore their conjugal relation.

Considering the submissions of the husband and the wife, the above named petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below within four weeks from today and the court below shall grant provisional bail to the petitioner in Complaint Case No. 1985 of 2013 on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7137 of 2015 (2) dt.20-02-2015 2/2 satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, after issuing notice to the complainant, the court below shall make all efforts for reconciliation of the dispute between the husband and the wife. If the dispute is resolved amicably between the parties, the provisional bail so granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed. In case the dispute is not resolved, the court below shall pass orders on the prayer for provisional bail of the petitioner on its own merit in accordance with law.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Dilip/- U T