← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13127/2019bail granted

Bipin Chaudhry v. The State Of Bihar

2019-04-08Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13127 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-375 Year-2018 Thana- KARAHGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Bipin Chaudhry, Son of Shivparsan Choudhary Resident of Village - Baraki Kharari, P.S.- Karahgar, Distt - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh No.10 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 326, 307, 354, 376, 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture and assault upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 3.10.2018 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the present case. The petitioner is father-in-law of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13127 of 2019(2) dt.08-04-2019 2/2 the victim. He has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. Except for the offence under Sections 307 and 376 IPC, rest are triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. Sasaram, Rohtas, Sasaram in connection with Kargahar P.S. Case No. 375/2018.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T