Kanchan Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.888 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2023 Thana- PANAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Kanchan Devi Wife of Late Devendra Singh Village- Pipra, P.O- Satjora, P.S- Panapur, District- Saran at Chapra 2.

Pritam Kumar Singh @ Pritam Singh son of Rakesh Singh Village- Pipra, P.O- Satjora, P.S- Panapur, District- Saran at Chapra 3.

Chandra Shekhar Singh Son of Haribansh Narayan Singh @ Haribansh Singh village-Sishai, Po- Dumarsan Bangra, Ps- mashrakh, Dist- Saran at Chapra 4.

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Singh son of Chandra Shekhar singh village-Sishai, Po- Dumarsan Bangra, Ps- mashrakh, Dist- Saran at Chapra 5.

Gavaskar Singh son of Haribansh Narayan Singh @ Haribansh Singh village-Sishai, Po- Dumarsan Bangra, Ps- mashrakh, Dist- Saran at Chapra 6.

Dhrup Kumar Singh @ Dhrup Singh son of Mahant Singh village- Pakri Narottam, Po- Satjora, Ps- panapur, Dist- Saran at Chapra 7.

Sunny Kumar Giri @ Sunni Giri son of LalBabu Giri village- and PostDubauli, at Present village and post office- Satjora, Ps- Panapur, Dist- Saran at chapra 8.

Viccky Singh @ Ranjan Kumar Singh Son of Manoj Singh village and poSareyan Basant, Ps- Taraiya, Dist- Saran at Chapra ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Geeta Devi Wife of Santosh Nut village- Bagdiha, Po- Satjora, Ps- panapur, Dist- Saran ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Jeetendra Narayan For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Binay Krishna ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-03-2026

1. Heard learned Counsel for the appellants and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. After some arguments, learned Counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw this appeal with liberty to

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.888 of 2025(16) dt.17-03-2026 2/2 approach this Court at the time of framing of charge.

3. Permission is granted.

4. This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T √