Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15887/2024allowed

Arjun Rai @ Arjun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-12Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15887 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2023 Thana- BHAGWAN BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== Arjun Rai @ Arjun Kumar Son Of Late Kamla Rai R/O-New Basti Brahmpur, P.S.-Bhagwan Bazar, Distt.-Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anjani Parashar, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 12-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 380 and 457 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, some unknown miscreants entered the house of the informant after breaking the window and committed loot of ornaments and Rs. 75,000/- from Almirah.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and the same has been lodged against unknown persons. The name of the petitioner has come into light, on the basis of confessional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15887 of 2024(2) dt.12-03-2024 2/2 statement of co-accused persons, which has got no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. Nothing incriminating/looted articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. On the basis of suspicion and due to his criminal antecedents, petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case by the police. He is languishing in judicial custody since 18.08.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 264 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T