Dhaniklal Sah @ Dhaniklal Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20451 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -32 Year- 2001 Thana -LAUKHA District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Dhaniklal Sah @ Dhaniklal Sahu, S/o Late Muneshwar Sah, Resident of Village- Parsahi, P.S.- Khutauna, District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Lokaha (Khutauna) P.S.Case No. 32 of 2001 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, 436 and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is named in the FIR.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that police has submitted final form against the petitioner finding case not true and he has not been sent up for trial but later on on protest petition cognizance has been taken against him and he has falsely been implicated in this case and he is in custody for more than six months.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20451 of 2017 (5) dt.07-07-2017 2/2 facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, in connection with Lokaha (Khutauna) P.S.Case No. 32 of 2001, G.R.No. 218 of 2001, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U