Medhavi Foundation v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3475 of 2026 ====================================================== Medhavi Foundation, a company registered under Companies Act 1956 having its registered office at 421 A, 2nd floor, City Center, Bartand, Dhanbad, Jharkhand- Pin- 826001, through its authorized representative Susan Chakraborty, Male, age about 33 years, Son of Samir Chakraborty, Resident of Debitala Road, Majher Para, North Barrackpore P.O. Ichapur, Nawabganj, District- North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, Pin- 743144. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna-01. 2.
The Secretary, Youth, Employment and Skill Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Mission Director, Bihar Skill Development Mission, Department of Labour Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna-01.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Venkatesh Kirti, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Government Pleader (05) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH) 17-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The following reliefs have been sought in the present writ petition:
"a) For issuance of Writ in nature of Certiorari quashing the Letter No. BSDM/Domain108/2025/2601 dated 27.11.2025 (Annexure-P/14) passed by Respondent No. 3 wherein the Petitioner Company has been blacklisted for next two years without considering the facts and circumstances of the case.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3475 of 2026(2) dt.17-03-2026 2/2 b.) For any other relief or reliefs which the petitioner may be found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case."
3. Upon perusal of records, it is evident that the petitioner has already made a representation before the Respondent No. 2 (Annexure-P/15 to the writ petition), which is pending consideration.
4. Accordingly, the Respondent No. 2 is directed to consider the aforesaid representation made by the petitioner and decide the same within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity of hearing to all the stakeholders.
5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
6. Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(Sudhir Singh, J) (Shailendra Singh, J) Sujit/- U