Bipin Saw @ Bipin Sao @ Bipin Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20055 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2014 Thana- KAJRA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.

Bipin Saw @ Bipin sao @ Bipin Sah S/O Sharwan Saw @ Sharwan Sah R/O Vill.- Khaira, P.S- Kajra, District- Lakhisarai 2.

Shubhag Saw @ Subhag Sao S/O Rohan Saw R/O Vill.- Khaira, P.S- Kajra, District- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mayank Bilochan For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-04-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioners seeking bail in connection with Kajra P.S. Case No. 19 of 2014 registered for the offence under Section 147, 148, 149, 427, 436, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3⁄4 of the Explosive Substance Act and under Section 10,13 of the UAP, Act.

3. Earlier, the bail application of the petitioners was rejected on 13.09.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 33570 of 2024, which reads as follows:

Heard learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20055 of 2026(2) dt.30-04-2026 2/3 petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Kajra P.S. Case No.

19 of 2014 registered for the offence under Section 147, 148, 149, 427, 436, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3⁄4 of the Explosive Substance Act and under Section 10,13 of the UAP, Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, 100-150 criminals came and by using cylinder bomb, have blasted and damaged a Harizan School.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent, and they have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that bail of one other coaccused namely Mantu Kora has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 21.05.2021 passed in Cr. Misc.

No. 2001 of 2021. He further submitted that petitioners are in jail since 03.07.2023 and 17.07.2023 respectively.

5. Learned APP for the State has relied upon a decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in the case of Gurwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Anr., bearing Criminal Appeal No.

704 of 2024, and has submitted that this is not a fit case for grant of regular bail registered under UAP Act.

He further submitted that the petitioners are accused in four more cases, and they are named in the F.I.R.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also in view of the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gurwinder Singh Vs. The State of Punjab and Another (Supra), I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

8. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioners and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20055 of 2026(2) dt.30-04-2026 3/3 conclude the same at the earliest.

4. The petitioners are in custody since 31.07.2023 and 03.07.2023 respectively. The charges were framed on 28.02.2024, but no witness has been examined till date.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature and gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the present application for regular bail filed on behalf of the petitioners stands rejected.

6. The Superintendent of Police, Lakhisarai is directed to ensure the attendance of the witnesses during the trial and to submit a report to this Court.

7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Superintendent of Police, Lakhisarai through FAX or e-mail for immediate compliance.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T