Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4114 of 2025 ====================================================== 1.

Ajay Kumar Son of Gorakhnath Sahni, Resident of Village- Jhiginagaha, Police Station- Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur. 2.

Amiri Lal Sahani, Son of Kalyug Sahani, Resident of Village- Mursandi, Police Station- Mursandi, District- Muzaffarpur. 3.

Ajay Kumar, Son of Nagendra Sahni, Resident of Village- Senduari, Police Station- Purshottam, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Bihar State Election Authority, Harding Road, Patna, through the Secretary.

3.

The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

5.

The District Cooperative Officer, Muzaffarpur. 6.

The Block Cooperative Officer, Motipur, Muzaffarpur. 7.

Smt. Laxmi Devi, Wife Shiv Nath Sahni, R/o Village- Saghanpura, PostRampur Bheriyahi, Police Station- Kathaia, District- Muzaffarpur, Member of the Managing Committee of Fisherman Cooperative Society. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashi Shekhar Sinha For the State :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Yadav, A.C. to G.A.-10 For the Election Authority: Mr.Mukesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Bihar State Election Authority.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that during pendency of this writ application the petitioners have approached the Election Authority and the matter is still pending

Patna High Court CWJC No.4114 of 2025(2) dt.17-03-2025 2/2 for consideration for the same relief as prayed in the present writ application.

3. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with liberty to the petitioners to pursue the matter before the Election Authority.

4. Permission is accorded.

5. This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U