← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18115/2016disposed

Sarika Chandrayan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-12-08Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 18115 of 2016 ====================================================== Sarika Chandrayan, Daughter of Sri Shambhunath, Resident of Village - Hariprasad, Post Office - Marai, Police Station - Jandaha, District - Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat (Bikas Bhawan), Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat (Bikas Bhawan) Patna.

4. The District Education Officer, Samastipur.

5. The Member Appellate Authority, District Teacher Employment Appellate Tribunal, Samastipur.

6. The District Superintendent of Education, Samastipur.

7. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Samastipur.

8. The Block Development Officer, Morwa, Samastipur.

9. The Block Education Officer, Morwa, Samastipur.

10. The Gram Panchayat Raj Rariahi, Block - Morwa, District - Samastipur through Panchayat Secretary.

11. The Panchayat Teacher Employment Committee, Gram Panchayat Raj, Rariahi, Block - Morwa, District - Samastipur through Panchayat Secretary.

12. The Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj, Rariahi, Block - Morwa, District - Samastipur.

13. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Rariahi, Block - Morwa, District - Samastipur.

14. Anita Kumari wife of Shambhu Prasad Ray, Resident of Village - Chakarman, Post Office - Shahpur Undi, Via - Patori, District - Samastipur.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 08-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition be disposed off with

Patna High Court CWJC No.18115 of 2016 (2) dt.08-12-2017 2/2 liberty to move before the State Appellate Authority against the order dated 28.12.2010 passed in Appeal No. 1275 of 2010 (Pa.), by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Samastipur.

3. Learned counsel for the State does not oppose.

4. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off with liberty aforesaid.

5. If an appeal is filed before the State Appellate Authority, within four weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed off on merits expeditiously and within the statutory period.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U