Jai Kishore Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.286 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1945 of 2016 ====================================================== Jai Kishore Prasad Son of Shri Ram Ayodhya Prasad Resident of VillageLahladpur, P.O. Panditpur, Police Station- Janta Bazar, District- Saran (Chapra), retired while working as Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Siwan. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, General Administrative Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Under Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The In-charge Officer Finance (Personal Claim Fixation Cell) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6.

The Divisional Commissioner Munger Division, Munger. 7.

The District Magistrate Begusarai.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Umesh Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prbhat Kumar Verma (AAG 3) Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma, AC to AAG 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 22-03-2021 The present Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 24.01.2019 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in CWJC No. 1945 of 2016 titled as Jai Kishore Prasad Vs. The State of Bihar and Ors. After the matter was heard for some time, finding

Patna High Court L.P.A No.286 of 2019 dt.22-03-2021 2/2 the Court not to be in favour of the submissions made, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present Letters Patent Appeal, reserving liberty to pursue his remedy, as would be available in law, with the appropriate authority.

Permission is granted.

Needless to add, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the representation of the appellant, if so filed, expeditiously.

Accordingly, this Letters Patent Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) anil/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date