← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18195/2025bail rejected

Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-10Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18195 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-192 Year-2024 Thana- GURARU District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Raju Kumar son of Ravindra Singh village-Bagadiha, Ps- Guraru, DistGaya 2.

Dharmendra Paswan son of Rajendra Paswan village-Bagadiha, Ps- Guraru, Dist- Gaya 3.

Nitish Kumar @ Gorkha Chandra Vashi son of Ramesh Singh villageBagadiha, Ps- Guraru, Dist- Gaya 4.

Lakhan Paswan son of Mungeshwar Paswan village-Bagadiha, Ps- Guraru, Dist- Gaya 5.

Niraj Kumar Son of Deni Mistri village-Bagadiha, Ps- Guraru, Dist- Gaya 6.

Ramkishore @ Nepali @ Ram Kishore Prasad son of Raghunandan Prasad @ Raghunandan Saw village-Bagadiha, Ps- Guraru, Dist- Gaya 7.

Pravin Kumar Singh @ Butali Singh son of Late Ranvir Singh villageBagadiha, Ps- Guraru, Dist- Gaya 8.

Niranjan Singh son of Subedar Singh village- shanker Bigha, ps- Konch, Dist- Gaya 9.

Binod Paswan Son of Nepali Paswan village- Dashrath Bigha, Ps- Guraru, Dist- Gaya 10.

Ranish Kumar @ Tuntun @ Raj Kumar Son of Shrikant Singh villageRukunpur Ps- Guraru, Dist- Gaya 11.

Pavi Kumar Son of Arjun Yadav village- Rukunpur Ps- Guraru, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for offence under Sections 192(2), 191(3), 190,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18195 of 2025(2) dt.10-04-2025 2/2 126(2), 127(2) 121(1), 121(2), 117(2), 61(2), 109, 132, 324(4), 352, 351(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per prosecution case, on 01.11.2024, all the F.I.R. named accused persons including these petitioners and 120 unknown persons surrounded the Block Office, Guraru and thereafter, attacked the officers posted there. They also threw bricks & stones on the officers and damaged the glass, chairs and CCTV cameras and thus, caused hindrance in discharge of their official duties.

4. Considering the nature of accusation, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T