Pinky Kumari v. Mr. Divesh Sehara, The Principal Secretary, Sc And St Welfare Department

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.383 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13260 of 2017 ====================================================== Pinky Kumari W/o Pankaj Kumar R/o Vill- Bidupur, P.S.- Bidupur, DistVaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Mr. Divesh Sehara, The Principal Secretary, SC and ST Welfare Department Bihar, Patna.

2.

Mr. Gautam Paswan, The Mission Director, Bihar Mahadalit Development, 5th Floor, Land Development Bank, Budh Marg, Patna-1. 3.

Mr. Vijay Singh, The Deputy Director, Welfare, Patna. 4.

Smt. Udita Singh, The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur. 5.

Mr. Arun Kumar, The Subdivisional Officer, Hajipur Subdivision, Vaishali at Hajipur.

6.

Mr. Nipendra Kumar Nirala, The District Programme Officer cum District Welfare Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur.

7.

Mr. Birendra Prasad Gupta, The Subdivisional Welfare Officer, Hajipur Subdivision, Vaishali at Hajipur.

8.

Mr. Lalan Choudhari, The Block Development Officer, Raghopur Block, District- Vaishali.

9.

Mr. Shashi Priya Verma, The Block Development Officer, Patedhi Belsar Block, District- Vaishali.

10.

Mr. Amarjet Kumar, The Block Development Officer, Bhagwanpur Block, District- Vaishali.

11.

Smt Kiran Kumari, The Block Development Officer, Bidupur Block, District- Vaishali.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Ranjan No.II, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Mandal (Sc3) Ms.Neelam Kumari, AC to SC-3 For the BMVK :

Mr.Ranjeet Kr. Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 13-03-2024

1. The defects, pointed out by the Registry, are ignored.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to

Patna High Court MJC No.383 of 2022(3) dt.13-03-2024 2/2 withdraw the present petition, to which the learned counsel for the opposite parties has got no objection.

3. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U