Rajniti Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13929 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2024 Thana- Ramgarh Chowk District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Rajniti Yadav Son of Mahatma Yadav Resident of Ramgarh, Shahnagar Ramgarh Chowk, P.S.- Ramgarh Chowk, Distt.- Lakhisarai-811311 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prabhakar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-05-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115, 126(2), 303(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 121, 121(A) and 122 of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of three cases and the informant alleges that on 19.09.2024 Ashok, Manoj, Sakichand and Vinod came at his door and started abusing, thereafter Ashok assaulted Chalitar by an iron object on his head causing injury and he became unconscious thereafter Sakichand assaulted Umesh by an iron road, further Vinod also assaulted Umesh by an iron rod on account of which he became unconscious, thereafter Vinod, Manoj and Krishna assaulted Shambhu, Santosh and Dheeraj causing injury, thereafter petitioner along with Baunnu and Daroga entered

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13929 of 2025(3) dt.13-05-2025 2/2 the house of Umesh and took Rs.3,000/-.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that specific allegation of assault is against Ashok, Sakichand and Vinod and the petitioner has been roped with ornamental allegation of taking Rs.3,000/- from the house of Umesh.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Ramgarh Chowk P.S. Case No. 165 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T