Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14192/2026bail granted

Suresh Mahto @ Suresh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-12Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14192 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-413 Year-2025 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Suresh Mahto @ Suresh Kumar S/O Late Devnarayan Mahto R/O VillageAlampur Dih, P.S- Bibhutipur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashank Shekhar Kunwar, Advocate Mr.Abhijeet Gautam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 12-03-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case no.413 of 2025 registered under sections 329(4), 126(2), 115(2), 74, 109(1), 351(2), 352, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, over a dispute between the parties, five named accused persons including the petitioner herein are said to have come and started to abuse the informant and the members of his family. Thereafter, the petitioner is said to have assaulted the informant with an iron rod on his head leading to injuries.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14192 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case because of prior dispute as would be evident from the FIR itself. Referring to the contents of the injury report of the informant which has been reproduced in the order of the learned trial Court rejecting the application for bail of the petitioner, learned counsel submits that even after the CT scan of the brain of the injured, the injury has been opined to be simple in nature. The petitioner is in custody since 27.11.2025, chargesheet has been submitted in the case and he has no criminal antecedent.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the FIR, the contents of the injury report of the informant whom the petitioner is alleged to have assaulted, the petitioner having remained in custody since 27.11.2025 and chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case no.413 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14192 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026 3/3 each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, District-Samastipur.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T