Prince Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18564 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-309 Year-2019 Thana- BARAUNI District- Begusarai ====================================================== PRINCE KUMAR S/O Pintu Singh @ Pintu Kumar R/o Bihat Gurdaspur, P.S. Barauni FCI P.S. District - Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 08-07-2020 This case has been heard through video conferencing. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case as lodged by the informant is that when he along with his nephew were going to Hathidah with his motorcycle then he noticed that three persons were following him with discover motorcycle without number then all of sudden they overtook his bike and threatened to showing the pistol to give his bike and they took over his bike and fled away. Informant identified all of them and disclosed their name as Prince Kumar (petitioner) Chunchun Singh and Sachin Kumar.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18564 of 2020(3) dt.08-07-2020 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 17.09.2019.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his payer for bail is rejected in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No. 309 of 2019 pending before the court of the learned C.J.M., Begusarai.

Accordingly, the application is dismissed. However, petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T