Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13625/2026dismissed

Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-26Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13625 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2023 Thana- KHIJARSARAI District- Gaya ====================================================== Ravi Kumar Son of Mahendra Sao Resident Of Village -Chiraili Ps -Khizersari Dist -Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Aryan Singh For the State :

Mr. Arun Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 26-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 638 of 2023 arising out of Khizersarai P.S. Case No. 79 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the IPC.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons are said to have abused and assaulted the informant's daughter due to non-fulmillment of demand of Rs. 5 lakh as dowry. It is further alleged that all the accused persons have killed informant's daughter and disappeared her body.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is a person of clean antecedent and is in custody since 09.05.2023. Learned counsel has further submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13625 of 2026(2) dt.26-02-2026 2/2 that all the charge-sheet witnesses have been examined.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the fact that all the charge-sheet witnesses have been examined and the trial is at the verge of its conclusion, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail of the petitioner is rejected with an observation that if trial is not concluded within a period of three months, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before the learned Court below itself.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) priyanka/- U T