Lala @ Suraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14666 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2020 Thana- MOKAMAH District- Patna ====================================================== Lala @ Suraj Kumar Son Of Chuha Singh @ Balmukund Singh Resident Of Mohalla- Moldiyar Tola, Police Station- Mokama And District- Patna ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Manish Kumar No2, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 06-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No. 130 of 2020 lodged under Sections 412 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has figured in this case but nothing has been recovered from his possession and his name has figured in this case only by virtue of confessional statement of the coaccused. Petitioner is in custody since 28.08.2020 in this case but he has 5 criminal antecedent of almost same nature. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is ready to file an understanding before the Court that he shall not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14666 of 2022(2) dt.06-07-2022 2/2 involve in such type of activities in future. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering that the name of petitioner is figured in this case by virtue of confessional statement but seeing his criminal antecedent, I am directing the trial court to grant bail to the petitioner to his satisfaction only after framing of charge. The petitioner is directed to appear on each and every date before the Trial Court, in case of non-appearance for two consecutive dates, shall resulted into cancellation of his bail bond. If he shall involve in such type of activities again, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
With this direction application is allowed.
(Dr. Anshuman, J) ravishankar/- U T