Sanjeev Chandravansi @ Sanjeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1713 of 2017 (5) dt.24-08-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1713 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -76 Year- 2017 Thana -BEUR District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Sanjeev Chandravansi @ Sanjeev Kumar Son of Sri Raju Chandravanshi , Resident of Mohalla- Sipara, P.S.- Beur, District- Patna. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. Smt Usha Kumari No-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-08-2017 The appellant seeks regular bail in connection with Beur P.S. Case No. 76 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302 of Indian Penal Code and Section and Section 3(2)(V) of SC/ST Act.

Allegation against the appellant is of causing death of the son of the informant by dashing him against an electric pole. It has been submitted on behalf of the appellant that though there is allegation that appellant dashed the deceased against an electric pole due to which deceased sustained injuries and died, however, in the post mortem report no external injury has been found, which itself proves the falsity of the case. Further petitioner has been in custody for four and half months. Heard learned Special P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, this appeal is allowed and impugned order is set aside. Let the

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1713 of 2017 (5) dt.24-08-2017 appellant above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Patna, in connection with Beur P.S. Case No. 76 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the appellant shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The appellant will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The appellant shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T