Jagdish Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24141 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2020 Thana- BARURAJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.
JAGDISH MAHTO SON OF LATE JANGBAHADUR MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DHARAMPUR ISHAK, P.S. BARURAJ, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR.
2.
BHARAT MAHTO SON OF LATE JANGBAHADUR MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DHARAMPUR ISHAK, P.S. BARURAJ, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR.
3.
SAROJ MAHTO SON OF LALBABU MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DHARAMPUR ISHAK, P.S. BARURAJ, DISTRICTMUZAFFARPUR. 4.
PRADIP KUMAR SON OF SANJAY MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGEDHARAMPUR ISHAK, P.S. BARURAJ, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. 5.
SAHINDRA MAHTO @ SAHENDRA KUMAR SON OF JAGDISH MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DHARAMPUR ISHAK, P.S. BARURAJ, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR.
6.
CHALU KUMAR @ GUDDU KUMAR SON OF JAGDISH MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DHARAMPUR ISHAK, P.S. BARURAJ, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR.
7.
ARVIND KUMAR @ ARVIND MAHTO SON OF YADOLAL MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GULAB PATTI PARSAUNI, P.S. SAHEBGANJ, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR 8.
GUDU KUMAR @ GUDDU KUMAR SON OF LALBABU MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DHARAMPUR ISHAK, P.S. BARURAJ, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nachiketa Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. A.G.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 17-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24141 of 2021(2) dt.17-01-2022 2/3 honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defect(s) as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 436, 354 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is a case of assaulting and outraging the modesty of the informant and setting her house on fire by pouring the kerosene oil.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that from perusal of the supervision note contained in para-14 of the case diary the case has not been found to be true under Sections 379 and 436 of the IPC and the same is not supported by the statement of the witnesses. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24141 of 2021(2) dt.17-01-2022 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Mahendra Mishra, learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Baruraj P.S. Case No. 181 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) brajesh kumar/- U T