Anjani Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24093 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-329 Year-2020 Thana- CIVIL LINE District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

ANJANI KUMAR Son of Ramjeevan Saw Resident of Village - Rampur, Chhatiana, P.S.- Makdumpur, District - Jehanabad. 2.

Ranjan Kumar Son of Ramjeevan Saw Resident of Village - Rampur, Chhatiana, P.S.- Makdumpur, District - Jehanabad. 3.

Pappu Kumar Son of Ramjeevan Saw Resident of Village - Rampur, Chhatiana, P.S.- Makdumpur, District - Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 07-01-2022 This matter has been taken up for hearing online because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Gaya Civil Line P.S. Case no. 329 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 323, 341, 427 and 353/34 of the Indian

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24093 of 2021(2) dt.07-01-2022 2/3 Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, petitioners along with other co-accused persons have created hindrance by pelting stones to the police party when the police personnel signaled to stop the motorcycle for driving without helmet. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has got no criminal antecedent. General and omnibus allegation has been levelled against them ans there is no specific allegation of assault against the petitioners. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Gaya Civil Line P.S. Case no. 329 of 2020, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-XI, Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under section

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24093 of 2021(2) dt.07-01-2022 3/3 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U