Anil Kumar @ Anil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13976 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-425 Year-2024 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Anil Kumar @ Anil Yadav Son of Baban Singh @ Baban Yadav Resident of Vill- Jagdishpur, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur, Ara (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Akash Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Iftekhar Mahmood ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 425 of 2024 dated 12.12.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 304(2), 109 and 132 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant along with police officials seized a motorcycle without number plate. In the meantime, the co-accused, Abhay Yadav and Matendra Kumar came for the release of the said motorcycle, the informant was not ready for releasing the seized motorcycle. Thereafter, the co-accused persons went to the shop of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13976 of 2025(2) dt.21-03-2025 2/3 Champaran Meat house and came along with 13-14 persons including the petitioner and attacked the three constables and the co-accused Abhay Yadav and Matendra Yadav snatched their pistol. It is further alleged that the petitioner and the co-accused, Lallu Samrat snatched the mobile phone.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The specific allegation of snatching pistol of of 9 mm is against the co-accused, Abhay Yadav, Matendra Yadav and Neeraj Yadav. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has five criminal antecedents in which he is on bail in all cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 14.12.2024. The coaccused has been granted regular bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 12966 of 2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13976 of 2025(2) dt.21-03-2025 3/3 of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Bhojpur in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 425 of 2024, with the condition:- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner are liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T