← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18798/2016dismissed

Nagendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-04-10Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18798 of 2016 ====================================================== Nagendra Singh Son of late Ram Nath Singh Resident of Village- MohallaGandhi Bazar Ward No. 8, P.S. Nagar Madhubani, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Commissioner, Darbhanga.

3.

The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

4.

The Additional Magistrate, Madhubani.

5.

The District Land Acquisition Officer, Madhubani. 6.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar Madhubani.

7.

The Circle Officer, Rahika, District Madhubani. 8.

Kishun Mahto Son of late Ramchandra Mahto Resident of Village- MohallaGandhi Bazar Ward No. 8, P.S. Nagar Madhubani, District- Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raj Kishore Roy-GP 18 :

Mr. Baidyanath Thakur, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 10-04-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs :- " (i) To direct the respondent authorities to quash the order dated 08.09.2016 passed by Circle officer, Rahika and to remove the encroachment by the encroacher (land as Khesra No. 4247) as well as some bad element person/ Dabang as respondent no.8 on Bihar Government land in way/Rasta of the petitioner and villagers.

(ii) To direct the respondent authorities to

Patna High Court CWJC No.18798 of 2016(2) dt.10-04-2023 2/2 provide the measuring and fix the actual possession of Government land and remove the encroachment by the respondent no.8.

(iii) To direct to make the respondent authorities adequate satisfactory and take sufficient decision on Government land as a public way."

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondent- authorities. Liberty so sought, is granted.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U