Anwar Ahmad @ Anwar Ahmad Shah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12103 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -8 Year- 2015 Thana -SIWAN CITY District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. Anwar Ahmad @ Anwar Ahmad Shah Son of Alamgir Shah, resident of village- Aranda, P.S.- M.H. Nagar, District- Siwan

2. Jamil Ahmad, son of Dost Mohammad, resident of village- Nawalpur, P.S.- Siwan Town, District- Siwan

3. Sabir Ali @ Sayed Sabir Ali, son of Bismillah @ Syed Bismillah, resident of village-Naya Quila Nawalpur, P.S.- Siwan Town, DistrictSiwan .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sayed Shamsul Haque, son of Abdul Rauf, resident of village-Naya Quila Nawalpur, P.S.-Siwan Town, District-Siwan. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Javed Aslam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Singh, APP For the O. P. No.2 : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 22-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Siwan Town P.S. Case No. 8 of 2015 registered under Sections 419, 467, 468, 471, 406 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.

The first information report is based on a complaint. It has been contended that only on the basis of vague and cryptic allegation, the petitioners have been made accused.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12103 of 2016 (3) dt.22-06-2016 2 / 2 It has further been contended that the offences alleged are not made out against the petitioners as no specific role has been attributed against them in the complaint.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 has opposed the application for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners.

Be that as it may, regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, the provisional anticipatory bail granted to the petitioners, vide order dated 18.03.2016 is, hereby, confirmed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U T