Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14267/2018rejected

Raghvendra Yadav @ Raghwendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-03-21Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14267 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2016 Thana- CHOUTARWA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Raghvendra Yadav @ Raghwendra Yadav S/o Lal... Yadav, R/o Village- Jaini Tola, P.S.- Choutarawa, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Milind Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. SRI BISHESHWAR RAM ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 21-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 23.05.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 18453 of 2017, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 14.11.2016, up-till now the charges have not been framed and as such in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded. The first information report has been lodged after delay of two days only with a view to extract money. As a matter of fact, the wife of the petitioner committed suicide as her brother refused to take her in a marriage ceremony and the dead body was cremated in the presence of his brother and her family members and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14267 of 2018(2) dt.21-03-2018 2/2 consideration.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner is the husband and the dead body was not found. In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of the prayer of bail of the petitioner, again his such prayer stands rejected in Sessions Trial No. 477 of 2017 arising out of Choutarawa (Bathwariya) P. S. Case No. 61 of 2016.

However, considering the period of detention, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T