← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14048/2022allowed

Ranjan Paswan @ Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-03Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14048 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2020 Thana- BAKHTIYARPUR District- Patna ====================================================== RANJAN PASWAN @ RANJAN KUMAR S/o Yoginder Paswan R/o Village- Badki Mahamadpur, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Harsh Vardhan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mukeshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 03-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 504, 506, 307, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner along with other co-accused is said to have attacked the informant by means of sword and also snatched Rs.10,000/- from the pocket of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner. He further submits that there is general and omnibus

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14048 of 2022(2) dt.03-11-2022 2/2 allegation levelled against the petitioner. He submits that similarly situated co-accused has already been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.02.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 49107 of 2021. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 174,2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T