Amarjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15465 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-993 Year-2021 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Amarjeet Kumar, Son of Anandi Sah R/o- Ward No.-12, Village- Bishanpur Alias Subhai Garh, P.S.- Hajipur (Sadar), District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Giri, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-07-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks of the complete start of the physical Court in normal course.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 993 of 2021 for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution story, in brief, is that three unknown miscreants looted the Pulser motorcycle, mobile phone, Pan Card, Aadhar card, etc. of the informant.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. The F.I.R. is against unknown. Name of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15465 of 2022(2) dt.11-07-2022 2/3 the petitioner has surfaced on the basis of confessional statement of one co-accused Krishna Kumar. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 13.11.2021. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. Considering the nature of allegation made against the petitioner as well as specific statement of the petitioner in Para8 of the bail application that no looted article has been recovered from possession of the petitioner and petitioner is in custody since 13.11.2021, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 993 of 2021, subject to the condition after verification it is found that the looted article was not recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15465 of 2022(2) dt.11-07-2022 3/3

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence, after his release on bail, the trial Court shall take steps to cancel his bail bonds.

(Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U T