Rajiv Ranjan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5232 of 2025 ====================================================== Rajiv Ranjan Singh S/o -Prabhunath Singh, R/o Mohalla Gur Ki Mandi Chouraha, Sher Shah Road, Post- Gulzarbagh, Police Station - Alam-ganj, District- Patna (Bihar), Pin Code - 800007.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar Main Secretariat, Patna (Bihar), Pin Code- 800015.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna Secretariat, Patna (Bihar), Pin Code- 800015.

3.

The Director, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Ground Floor, New Secretariat, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna (Bihar), Pin Code- 800015. 4.

The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya (Bihar), Pin Code- 824234. 5.

The Principal Secretary, Finance, Government of Bihar, Sardar Patel Marg, Veerchand Patel Road Area, Patna (Bihar), Pin Code- 800001. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Vikas Kumar, AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 01-08-2025 When the matter is called out, learned counsel for the petitioner has not remained present. However, Mr. Vikas Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent State, under instruction, submits that this writ petition has become infructuous. It has also been contended that since last two occasions, learned counsel for the petitioner is not remaining present.

Patna High Court CWJC No.5232 of 2025(2) dt.01-08-2025 2/2

2. In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent State that the matter has become infructuous, petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous.

3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to revive the petition, in case of any difficulty.

4. It is clarified that we have not examined the merits of the case of the petitioner.

(Vipul M. Pancholi, CJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) K.C.Jha/- U