Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15422/2026bail rejected

Md. Amem Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-14Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15422 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-627 Year-2025 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna ====================================================== Md. Amem Alam S/o Javed Alam R/o House no A/55, First floor Road no B/6, Alinagar colony, Anisabad, P.s.- Gardanibag, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ramji Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Jha Vikram, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-07-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Earlier, vide order dated 25.03.2026, the matter was referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre, Patna High Court. From perusal of mediator's report dated 08.05.2026 it is apparent that despite best efforts, the dispute between the parties could not be resolved through the process of mediation.

4. As per prosecution case, informant alleged that on the assurance of this petitioner, he invested substantial amount

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15422 of 2026(3) dt.14-07-2026 2/2 in the real estate development projects of the petitioner and also induced several other persons to invest in the same. Petitioner promised repayment of investments with profit and allotment of flats. However, despite receiving the investment and repeated requests, petitioner neither returned the invested amount nor delivered any flats. Petitioner has got seven criminal antecedents of similar nature.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation, gravity of offence and the fact that petitioner has got seven criminal antecedents of similar nature, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T