Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31605/2017bail granted

Jarina Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-13Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31605 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -86 Year- 2016 Thana -SONO District- JAMUI ====================================================== Jarina Khatoon .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Achal Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 86 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 409, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner that she in collusion with Branch Manager and treasurer has fraudulently withdrawn Rs. 1,09,000/- from the bank and misappropriated the same. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged offence as she is not the chairman of the women self help group and Bank account is in the name of Sultana Begum. Moreover, other co-accused has already been granted bail in this case and the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 30.05.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts as stated above, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand)

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31605 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-Ist, Jamui, in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 86 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make herself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on her part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of her bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T