Birendra Kumar Singh @ Biro v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

(FROM RESIDENTIAL OFFICE VIA VIDEO APPLICATION) CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17284 of 2020 ====================================================== Birendra Kumar Singh @ @ Biro son of Bhola Prasad Singh @ Bhola Singh, R/o vill- Bangardih, P.S.- Laxmipur, District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Niranjan Parihar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 16-07-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Narsingh Tanti, learned APP for the State.

The petitioner in the present case is apprehending his arrest in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 427 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and the informant are cousin brother who seems to have indulged in a fight because of some land dispute and right to easement. It is submitted that there is one injury caused by this petitioner on the head of the informant which is grievous in nature. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. It is submitted that on perusal of the injury report of the informant it would appear that lacerated wound on head (left parietal region) has been noticed which is grievous in nature. Another injury as well on the body and the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17284 of 2020(3) dt.16-07-2020 2/2 grievous injury has been specifically attributed to this petitioner. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the gravity of the offence alleged and the kind of the materials available on the record, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for anticipatory bail is, thus, refused. In case the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail before learned court below within four weeks from today, his prayer for regular bail shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order.

The application stands dismissed.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/sushmaU T Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.