Hardeo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13826 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-299 Year-2025 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

Hardeo Yadav S/o Late Babulal Yadav R/o Village- Medanichak, P.SParasbigha, Dist- Jehanabad. 2.

Rashmi Devi @ Reshmi Devi W/o Hardeo Yadav R/o Village- Medanichak, P.S- Parasbigha, Dist- Jehanabad.

3.

Indu Kumar S/o Hardeo Yadav R/o Village- Medanichak, P.S- Parasbigha, Dist- Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Senior Advocate with

1. Vishal Vikram Rana, 2. Misha Bharti, 3. Akash Priya, 4. Anurag Darshi, 5. Kumar Saurav Dev and

6. Utkarsh Vikram Rana, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-02-2026 Heard Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, learned senior counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case, registered for the offence under Sections 80(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per prosecution case, daughter of informant was married with co-accused Bindu Kumar on 25.04.2024 and after the marriage, she was subjected to cruelty and harassment by the accused persons for dowry and ultimately, on 19.11.2025, she was killed by the accused persons by strangulation.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13826 of 2026(2) dt.27-02-2026 2/2

4. Petitioner no. 1 is father-in-law, petitioner no. 2 is mother-in-law and petitioner no. 3 is brother-in-law of the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation. Thrust of the accusation is against husband of the deceased, who is already in custody since 01.12.2025. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with the family affairs of deceased and her husband. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jehanabad in connection with Parasbigha P.S. Case No. 299 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., 2023. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T