Ravindra Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.22422 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -94 Year- 2017 Thana -DHAKA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================
1. Ravindra Kumar, son of Vivek Singh,
2. Jai Prakash Kumar, son of Ashirwad Singh,
3. Awinash Kumar, son of Ram Bahadur Singh, All are residents of VillageMadhubani Kala, P.S.- Chiraiya, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Adv.
Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 30(b) of the Bihar Excise Act, 2016 in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 94/2017.
Allegation against the petitioners is of recovery of 10 and 1⁄2 litres Nepali wine.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have no criminal antecedent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Further, the petitioner has remained in custody for
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22422 of 2017 (3) dt.04-07-2017 2/2 about three and half months.
Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor also. Having heard both sides, in view of the facts, stated above, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Dhaka, East Champaran in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 94/2017, subject to conditions that one of the bailors should be relative of the petitioners and another having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court below with further condition that they will co-operate in disposal of the trial and will make themselves available before the court and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without any appropriate reason will be liable for cancellation of their bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) Rakhi U T