← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4841/2015dismissed

Mohan Tanti v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-04-10Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4841 of 2015 =========================================================== Mohan Tanti, aged about 50 years, S/o Late Ramdhari Tanti, a Permanent Resident of Village- Chakman Singh, P.O.- Jamalpur, District- Munger, Bihar, Presently residing at Q. No.- Old- C- 1-15, RAU Campus, Pusa, P.S.- Pusa, DistrictSamastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Agriculture Production Commissioner, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Rajendra Agriculture University through its Resident having officer at Pusa, Samastipur.

3. The Vice- Chancellor, RAU, Pusa, Samastipur.

4. The Director, Administration, RAU, Pusa, Samastipur.

5. The Director, SRI, Pusa, Samastipur.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sri Niwas Jha For the Respondent/s: Mr. GP6- PRASHANT PRATAP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 10-04-2015 A K Tripathi, J.

An identical issue was raised in a batch of writ applications, which were taken up together and decided by a detailed order on 15.1.2015. The case is of Rakesh Kumar Prasad and others vs. Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, which is CWJC No. 5768 of 2014 and other analogous cases.

2. Since the issue raised in the present writ application and the reason for termination of the petitioner from the post is identical as those petitioners, writ application has been dismissed for the rationale and reasoning after taking into consideration the relevant provisions, the background under which such selection came to be made as well as the necessity for their removal has already been dealt with.

3. Rationale and reasoning provided in the batch of writ applications

Patna High Court CWJC No.4841 of 2015 dt.10-04-2015 2 / 2 also governs the writ application of the present petitioner.

4. Writ application is dismissed for the same reason. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) R.K.Pathak/- U