Dhanji Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12207 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-555 Year-2019 Thana- BRAHMPUR District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.

DHANJI YADAV Son of Madan Yadav, Resident of Village - Shivpur, P.S.- Sahpur, District- Bhojpur 2.

Sugi @ Kamlesh Yadav Son of Basdhar Yadav @ Basudhar Yadav, Resident of Village - Shivpur, P.S.- Sahpur, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State through the virtual court proceeding. In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Bramhpur P.S. Case No.555 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

The police has recovered 13 litres of mahua liquor from the house of Dhanji Yadav and Ganesh Chauhan and apart from that different quantity of mahua liquor has been recovered from the other co-accused persons.

Looking to the quantity of liquor and the petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12207 of 2020(2) dt.12-06-2020 2/2 having no criminal antecedent, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is allowed and they, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2nd Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Buxar in connection with Bramhpur P.S. Case No.555 of 2019/, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court. If the petitioners are found involved in similar type of allegation in future, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application for cancellation of their bail bond.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T