← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15344/2016dismiss for nonprosecution

Mannu Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-08-05Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15344 of 2016 ====================================================== Mannu Singh son of Late Ajay Singh, Resident of Village Raghopur, Dumari Buzurg, P.S. Naya Gaon, District Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Land and Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Commissioner, Saran Division, Saran.

4.

The District Magistrate-cum- Collector, Chapra at Saran. 5.

The District Land Acquisition Officer, Chapra at Saran. 6.

Sri Vikas Kumar Singh, son of Late Satrughan Singh, Resident of Dumari Buzurg, Post- Dumari Buzurg, P.S. Naya Gaon, District Chapra at Saran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mrs. Nutan Sahay, AC to AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 05-08-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though Mrs. Nutan Sahay, learned AC to AAG-12 is present.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):

"for issuance of appropriate Writ(s)/Order(s)/Direction(s) to the Respondent concern for complying and enforcing the order dated 02.03.2016 passed through Memo No. 343 by the District Land Acquisition Officer, Chapra at Saran whereby and where under he has

Patna High Court CWJC No.15344 of 2016(2) dt.05-08-2025 2/2 directed the Respondent No. 6 for depositing the amount of Rs.7,28,682.24p (Rupees Seven Lakh Twenty Eight Thousand Six Hundred Eighty Two and Twenty Four paise only) which has not been deposited by the Respondent No. 6 till today; and/or for any other relief(s) for which the Petitioner may be found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the present case."

3. On 04.08.2025 also, both in the forenoon and afternoon, there was no appearance.

4. It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in the case. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for nonprosecution. (Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U