← Library
Patna High CourtC.R./1105/1992dismiss for nonprosecution

Raj Nath Singh @ Raj Nath Rai v. Daroga Rai And ORS

2025-07-18Mr. Justice Khatim Reza2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVISION No. 1105 of 1992 ====================================================== 1 Raj Nath Singh @ Raji Nath Rai

2. Awadhesh Singh @Awadh Rai

3. Gorakh Singh @ Gorakh Rai

4. Pramod Singh @ Pramod Rai

5. Sri Ramji Singh @ Sri Ramji Rai

6. Vishwanath Singh @Vishwanath Rai All sons of Nagina Rai.Residents of Village Jhanjhawan, P. S. Barauli, District Goalganj.

--------- Petitioners.

Versus

1. Daroga Rai, son of Waji Rai

2. Smt. Kumari Devi, daughter of Daroga Rai. Both residents of Village Jhanjhawan, P.S.-Barauli, District- Gopalganj. ---Plaintiffs Opposite parties 3.Bindeshwari Devi wife of Mokhtar Singh, resident of Village- Imedpur, P. S. Basantpur, District Siwan.

4. Saraswati Devi wife of Steshwar Singh resident of Village- Kararghat, P.S.Mohamedpur, District Gopalganj.

5. Naina Devi wife of Bhola Singh resident of village- Jhanjhwan, P. S. Barauli, District Gopalganj.

6. Shail Devi wife of Upendra Singh, resident of Village Dowkali, P. S. Mohammedpur, Distt.-Gopalganj.

---- Opposite Party Nos. 4 to 6 are daughters of Nagina Bai, residents of Jhanjhawan, P. S. Barauli, District Gopalganj.

7. Awadh Kishore Rai, son of Ramji Rai

8. Ashok Rai, son of Shivji Rai, Both are resident of Village Jhanjhawan, P.S.-Barauli, District-Gopalganj.

9. Prabhunath Rai, son of Kailash Rai,

Patna High Court C.R. No. 1105 of 1992(15) dt.18-07-2025 2/2 resident of Village-Haluwar, P.S.-Barauli, District-Gopalganj. ------------------Opposite party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Opposite party/s :

Mr.B. K. M. Tripathi, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 18-07-2025 This is the third consecutive occasion when there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.

2. Earlier also, on 24.04.2025 and 17.06.2025, when the matter was taken up, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners.

3. In presence of learned counsel for the opposite parties the instant civil revision petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. (Khatim Reza, J) shyambihari/- U