Sangeeta Kumari @ Uganti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 22083 of 2014 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -79 Year- 2002 Thana - BARACHATTI District- GAYA ======================================================== Sangeeta Kumari @ Uganti Kumari Daughter of Singar Singh Resident of Village - Baghalati, P.S.- Mohanpur, District - Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ======================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. J. Upadhyay, APP. ======================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 09-04-2015 The Petitioner who was the Informant seeks quashing of the order dated 29.06.2004 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya thereafter on 29.01.2014 the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sherghati has issued non-bailable warrant of arrest in Barachati P.S. Case No. 79 of 2002 (Tr. No. 479 of 2002/1739 of 2014).

Considering the circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.

However, the Petitioner is directed to appear before the Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order after which he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of concerned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22083 of 2014 dt.09-04-2015 Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Barachati P.S. Case No. 79 of 2002 (Tr. No. 479 of 2002/1739 of 2014) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

With these observations, the application is disposed off.

Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T