Md. Taslim @ Taslim Haque v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15282 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2024 Thana- DIGHALBANK District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Md. Taslim @ Taslim Haque S/O Imtiyaz Ali R/O Village- Singhimari Milik, P.S- Kodhobari, Distt.- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Dighalbank P.S Case No. 57/2024 dated 13.05.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 364A and 365 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the co-accused, Md. Hasibur Rahman along with the unknown miscreants is alleged to have abducted the informant's son and demanded Rs. 1,50,000/- as ransom.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15282 of 2025(2) dt.14-05-2025 2/2 possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the course of investigation. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this court vide order dated 28.08.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 58535/2024. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 28.11.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner. The victim in his statement recorded u/s 164 of the Cr.P.C. has stated the name of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Kishanganj in connection with Dighalbank P.S Case No. 57/2024.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T