← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14085/2026disposed

Ram Subhag Paswan @ Samsubhag Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-24Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14085 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-387 Year-2025 Thana- OBRA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Ram Subhag Paswan @ Samsubhag Paswan S/O Naurang Paswan (Incorrectly typed in FIR as Maurang Paswan) R/O Vill.- Sonhuli, P.S. Obra, Dist.- Aurangabad.

2.

Rooplal Paswan S/O Krishna Paswan R/O Vill.- Sonhuli, P.S. Obra, Dist.- Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Aman Vishal, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 24-06-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is allowed to withdraw the anticipatory bail application of petitioner no. 2, Rooplal Paswan on the ground that he has been arrested.

2. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application of petitioner no. 2, Rooplal Paswan is rejected as withdrawn.

3. Heard Mrs. Leelawati Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

4. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Obra P.S. Case No. 387 of 2025 for the offence registered under sections 190, 191(2), 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 74 of the BNS, 2023.

5. As per the prosecution story, the lady informant alleged that the named accused persons armed variously came and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14085 of 2026(5) dt.24-06-2026 2/2 assaulted the informant's side due to land dispute. So far as this petitioner is concerned, allegation is that he assaulted Nandlal Ram causing injury on the head. This led to the FIR.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is case and counter case, both sides have suffered and the informant also suffered fracture.

7. Learned APP on the other hand submits that not only the petitioner no. 1 has criminal antecedent, the injury inflicted by him to Nandlal Ram has been found to be grievous in nature.

8. Considering the submissions of the parties as also the nature of injury that has come against him, no relief can be extended.

9. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

10. However, if the petitioner surrenders within four weeks from today, the Court concerned shall take up the matter and dispose it of preferably on the same day. (Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U T