← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6155/2015dismiss for nonprosecution

Nav Vikash Vihar And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-09-22Mr. Justice A. Abhishek Reddy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6155 of 2015 ====================================================== 1.

Nav Vikash Vihar, , registered office at Alam Nagar, Madhepura represented through its Secretary, Mr. Chandra Moleshwar, S/o- Shri Kapileshwar Jha, resident of village P.O- Bhawanpur, P.S.- Bihapur, District- Bhagalpur (Registration No.764/92-93).

2.

Chandra Moleshwar @ Chandra Moleshwar Jha, son of Shri Kapileshwar Jha, resident of village P.O- Bhawanpur, P.S.- Bihapur, District- Bhagalpur (Registration No.764/92-93).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar.

2.

The District Magistrate-cum-Chairman, National Child Labour Project, Araria.

3.

The Project Director, National Child LAbour Project-cum- Assistant Director, District Social Security Cell, Araria. 4.

Shri Vidhan Chandra Yadav, Senior Dy. Collector, Araria. 5.

Shri Kumar Sidhhartha, Senior Dy. Collector, Araria. 6.

Shri Noor Ahmed Shibli, Senior Dy. Collector, Araria. (Respondent No. 4 to 6 are the Enquiry Officer to make enquiry of centres of the petitioners. 7.

The Block Development Officer, Kursakanta, District- Araria. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA-7.

Mr. Abshishek Singh, AC to GA-7.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 22-09-2023 Even today there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.

2. The matter was earlier listed on 23.08.2023 and 08.09.2023, on which dates there were also no representation on behalf of the petitioners.

Patna High Court CWJC No.6155 of 2015(7) dt.22-09-2023 2/2

3. Today the matter is listed under the heading "For Orders" but none appeared on behalf of the petitioners.

4. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the present Writ Petition.

5. The present Writ Petition, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.

(A. Abhishek Reddy , J) shakir/- U