Md. Tabrej Mian @ Tabrej Mian v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.30873 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -110 Year- 2015 Thana -PAKRIDAYAL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================
1. Md. Tabrej Mian @ Tabrej Mian S/o Suleman Mian R/o VillageChorma, (Bangla Tola). P.S. Pakaridayal, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramakant Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No. 110 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner's name transpired in this case only on the confessional statement of co-accused and except that there is nothing against the petitioner and even the father of the deceased has not named the petitioner. Further the co-accused, who named the petitioner has land dispute with the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 24.12.2016. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that petitioner's name transpired in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and except that there is nothing against the petitioner, let the petitioner above named, be
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30873 of 2017 (3) dt.24-07-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No. 110 of 2015, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T