← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18974/2022bail granted

Md. Manover Hussain @ Md. Manover Hasan v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-14Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18974 of 2022 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18324 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3141 Year-2017 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== MD. MANOVER HUSSAIN @ MD. MANOVER HASAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajiv Kumar Verma Mr.Rohan Verma For the Union of India :

Mr. Radhika Raman, CGC Mr, Awadhesh Kr, Pandey Dr. K.N Singh, Addl. Sol. General For the Opposite Party/s :

For the State :

Mr.Rajendra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-09-2022 Heard the parties.

Considered the submission of the parties.

On the complaint of the wife, the petitioner has been dismissed and admittedly, he has lost his job and therefore, he has no source of income.

The terms of bail are modified to the extent that the petitioner will pay Rs. 5,000/- per month to the opposite party beginning with this month, subject to the condition that the opposite party appears in all proceedings i.e. criminal proceedings and divorce proceedings filed by the petitioner and pending in various Courts. If she does not cooperate in those

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18974 of 2022(7) dt.14-09-2022 2/2 proceedings then the petitioner will have liberty to move this Court for further modification of the order of maintenance of Rs. 5,000/- per month. The petitioner has the liberty to get the order modified if he produces some evidence that the girl is working as a teacher in some school.

The order dated 30.07.2019 granting anticipatory bail is modified. The petitioner has also liberty to challenge his termination in accordance with law which has been challenged before this Court.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/-Sunny U