Sunita Kumari @ Sunita Devi, v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4613 of 2024 ====================================================== Sunita Kumari @ Sunita Devi, Wife of Sri Umesh Yadav, Resident of VillageAmwari, P.O.- Nandpur Amwari, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Director, Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS), Govt. of Bihar, Indira Bhawan, West Boring Canal Road, Patna.

2.

The Divisional Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra. 3.

The District Magistrate, Siwan.

4.

The District Progamme Officer, Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS), Siwan.

5.

The Child Development Project Officer (C.D.P.O.)Raghunathpur, P.O. and P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan.

6.

Kumari Sima Yadav, Wife of Brajesh Kumar, Resident of Village- Amwari, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bipin Bihari Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Madhaw Pd. Yadaw, GP-23 Mr. Arvind Kumar, AC to GP-23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 04-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "That, this writ petition is being preferred for setting aside the order-dated 12.01.2023 passed by District Progamme Officer, ICDS, Siwan in Appeal Case No. 06/2022-23 Smt.

Kumari Seema Yadav Versus Sunita Kumari and others whereby the Appeal was allowed and the appointment of petitioner was directed to be cancelled with immediate

Patna High Court CWJC No.4613 of 2024(2) dt.04-04-2024 2/2 effects indicating the selection of Seema Devi in her place in absence of proper consideration to pleading of parties and arguments advanced therein with supporting documents and further prayer for restoration of proposition/status as earlier before adverse order."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a civil suit before the learned civil court of competent jurisdiction. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U