Sukesh Yadav @ Sukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15114 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2025 Thana- KUMAR KHAND District- Madhepura ====================================================== Sukesh Yadav @ Sukesh Kumar, S/o Late Budhu Yadav, R/o VillageRanipatti, Ward No.14, P.S- Belari, Dist- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nafisu Zzoha, Advocate Mr. Nasar Iqbal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner along with others has killed the husband of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the F.I.R. itself it is clear that petitioner is the son of the deceased. It has further been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15114 of 2026(3) dt.15-04-2026 2/3 submitted that there is no eye witness of the occurrence. During course of investigation, blood stains were found from two coaccused persons Saurav Kumar and Sakaldev Kumar. Sakaldev and Saurav have been granted bail by learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 69019 of 2025 and 67487 of 2025 respectively. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that only on the basis of suspicion, the name of this petitioner has surfaced in this case. Save and except the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner. He is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 15.03.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the application for bail. Learned counsel for the informant has submitted that in this case, from confessional statement of the co-accused, it is clear that the petitioner has arranged Rs. 60,000/- for killing of his father.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15114 of 2026(3) dt.15-04-2026 3/3 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Madhepura in connection with Kumarkhand P.S. Case No. 75 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T