Pintu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5484 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -200 Year- 2005 Thana -DHANARUA District- PATNA ====================================================== Pintu Yadav, son of Naresh Prasad, Resident of Village- Pakaura, Police Station- Kadirgaj, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No-2, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 01-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 9.9.2017 in connection with Dhanarua P.S. Case No.200 of 2005 registered for the offences under Sections 324, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., subsequently, his name has figured. It is submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the present petitioner was unaware of his name having been included and the main allegation is against one Dara Singh and not against the present petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and that he has no criminal antecedents.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5484 of 2018 (2) dt.01-02-2018 2/2 Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Patna, in connection with Dhanarua P.S. Case No.200 of 2005, subject to the following conditions:

(1) One of the bailors will be his own relative, namely, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T