← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5653/2015disposed

Geeta Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-02-26Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5653 of 2015 ====================================================== Geeta Kumari Wife of Raj Kumar Sah, resident of vilage Makra P.S. Nayagaon, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Social Wefare Department, Integrated Child Development Scheme I C D S Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Commissioner Saran at Chapra.

5.

The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra 6.

The District Programme Officer, Saran at Chapra 7.

The Divisional Officer, Sonepur, Saran 8.

The B.D.O, Sonepur, Saran 9.

The C.D.P.O Sonepur, Saran 10.

The Mukhiya, GP Raj, Nayagaon, Saran 11.

Raj Kumari Devi wife of Naresh Yadav Resident of village- Makra Ward No. 12, P.O and P.S. Nayagaon District- Saran. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Dhananjay Mishra, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Anjani Kumar- AAG6 Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AC to AAG 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 26-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner submits that against selection of respondent no.9 as Anganwari Sevika she has made specific claim that candidature of respondent no.9 was not in accordance with law and that instead of respondent no.9 the petitioner should have been selected.

The issue regarding selection in question is pending

Patna High Court CWJC No.5653 of 2015(2) dt.26-02-2019 2/2 before the District Magistrate, Saran. The petitioner submits that in respect of the said grievance having been lodged in November, 2014, till today the same has not been considered or disposed of.

In view of the grievance raised by the petitioner's counsel, this Court would direct that if no final decision has been taken/communicated to the petitioner, pursuant to her grievance dated 20.11.2014, respondent District Magistrate, Saran should dispose of the same by a reasoned and speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

Writ petition is disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Shashi U